Skip to content
CASE PREVIEW

Justices to consider standards for special-education discrimination suits

By Ronald Mann on April 27 at 11:34 p.m.

In A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, the court will consider the standard for awarding damages when a school district fails to provide an adequate education to a child with a disability. Most courts require a showing of active bad faith, but some think that deliberate indifference is enough. The justices will hear argument in the case on Monday.

Supreme Court

The court will hear A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools at 10 a.m. EDT on Monday. (Katie Barlow)

SCOTUS NEWS

After oral argument, court calls for new briefs in HHS task force case

By Amy Howe on April 26 at 12:10 p.m.

The court on Friday called for both sides in a dispute over the constitutionality of a task force within the Department of Health and Human Services to file new briefs on the HHS secretary’s power to appoint members to the group. At oral argument in the case on Monday the justices, particularly Neil Gorsuch, questioned whether the HHS secretary actually has the power to appoint members of the Preventive Services Task Force, or whether the court should reach that issue.

ARGUMENT ANALYSIS

Supreme Court likely to rule for parental opt-out on LGBTQ books in schools

 at 5:43 p.m.

The court’s conservative majority appeared to strongly favor the arguments of a group of Maryland parents who want to be able to opt their children out of instruction that includes books with LGBTQ+ themes. The books include stories such as a young girl’s experience with her uncles’ wedding and the school board argues that their inclusion in the curriculum does not merit a free exercise claim. But the court seemed to find the option to opt kids out a straightforward, even obvious, solution.

EMERGENCY DOCKET

Trump asks Supreme Court to allow ban on transgender service members from the military

at 2:21 p.m.

The Trump administration came to the court on Thursday to ask the justices to allow it to enforce a policy that disqualifies anyone who has gender dysphoria or has undergone medical interventions to treat gender dysphoria from serving in the military. A lower court judge blocked the policy nationwide, calling it a “de facto blanket prohibition on transgender service.” The court quickly called for a response from the service members challenging the case by May 1.

Advocates in Conversation

2024-Jan-Snow-Banner-4B-scaled
San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu discusses City and County of San Francisco v. EPA, in which the court is considering whether the Environmental Protection Agency violates the Clean Water Act when it imposes generic prohibitions in a permit for a city’s water discharges, without specifying explicit standards for discharges.   
Read More

More news

WHAT WE’RE READING

The morning read for Monday, April 28

By Ellena Erskine | April 28, 2025

The court will hear oral argument in two cases this morning. The justices will hear A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, a dispute over the standard for awarding damages when a school district fails to provide an adequate education to a child with a disability. And in Soto v. U.S., the court will consider a technical question relating to compensation for veterans.

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Monday morning read:

Coming up: On Tuesday, April 29, the court expects to issue one or more opinions from the current term. Well be live at 9:45 a.m. EDT.

RELIST WATCH

Federal jurisdiction and the constitutionality of eviction moratoriums

By John Elwood | April 25, 2025

The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. A short explanation of relists is available here.

The Supreme Court made short work of two of last week’s first-time relists. The court granted review in United States Postal Service v. Konan to determine whether the Federal Tort Claims Act provision exempting claims arising from “the loss” or “miscarriage” of letters or postal matter extends to claims that the Post Office deliberately refused to deliver mail to an address. But the court denied review of landlord Lebene Konan’s cross-petition claiming that Postal Service employees conspired to deny her civil rights.

Continue Reading
WHAT WE’RE READING

The morning read for Friday, April 25

By Ellena Erskine | April 25, 2025

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Friday morning read:

WHAT WE’RE READING

The morning read for Thursday, April 24

By Ellena Erskine | April 24, 2025

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Thursday morning read:

SCOTUSBLOG NEWS

The Future of SCOTUSblog

By Amy Howe | April 23, 2025

Dear SCOTUSblog readers,

As one era ends, an exciting new one begins.

SCOTUSblog is delighted to announce that it has been acquired by Dispatch Media, Inc., and will round out The Dispatch’s coverage of the Supreme Court and the rule of law.

This blog began nearly a quarter of a century ago as a way to promote our legal work. Over the years, it has evolved into a resource on all things related to the Supreme Court, from soup-to-nuts coverage of the cases argued at the court to retirements, confirmations, and other special features. We have scaled back our coverage in recent years as the costs of that coverage grew, but through our partnership with The Dispatch, we will be able to restore SCOTUSblog’s publishing capabilities, including expanded analysis for all merits cases and oral arguments.

Continue Reading